Support Orly Taitz for California Secretary of State 2010

Donate to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA Secretary of State 2010

---

Support Orly Taitz
For California Secretary of State
June 8 Republican Primary
RunOrlyRun.com
She needs your help to win the primary against RINO Damon Dunn, who was a registered Democrat in FL until he registered as a Republican in CA last year, and who listed Barack Obama as his role model in an interview given to Stanford Scout. The country needs just one constitutionalist Secretary of State to prevent another 2008 election fiasco of voter fraud and unqualified candidates.
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was born and raised in the Communist Soviet Union and knows firsthand the bleakness of a totalitarian regime and depravation of Constitutional rights. She is well known around the country as a Constitutional attorney with a case pending in Washington, D.C. on the unconstitutionality of the recent Health Care law and Mr. Obama’s dual citizenship, refusal to present any of his original vital records, and other fraud.
Dr. Taitz is an attorney and a dentist and owns a successful dental practice. She is the President of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation and Editor of the OrlyTaitzEsq.com blog, where she writes prolifically. She has been a registered Republican in California for years. Dr. Taitz is married to her husband of 23 years and a mother to 3 sons, ages 20, 18 and 16. Her oldest son is graduating from an Ivy League university pre-med program next year and her younger sons are in the last years of High School.
Key Platform Values
 Ensure Legitimacy of elections and Verify Credentials of the candidates and voters
 Prosecute voter fraud
 Support the Safe Vote Bill
 Respect the military by making sure their votes count
 Advocate for a friendly corporate climate and tax credits for job producing corporations
 Defend California from unconstitutional laws and job killing federal agencies
 Restore the teaching of basic civics education
For More Information go to RunOrlyRun.com & OrlyTaitzESQ.com, e-mail dr_taitz@yahoo.com

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

---

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, §HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH
§ PRESIDING
v. § Civil Action: 10-151 RCL
§ Defendant.
Barack Hussein Obama, §MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
§
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Plaintiff in this case respectfully requests a judicial notice of the order by Judge Roger Vinson, Northern district of Florida, State of Florida et al v Department of Health et al 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT. Exhibit 1.
Plaintiff in this case, being a Doctor of Dental Surgery, was seeking an intervener status in case 10-cv-91, which was brought by attorneys of 13 states challenging constitutionality of the Healthcare Bill H.R. 3590. While motion to intervene was not granted under judicial discretion due to the fact that multiple interveners have filed their motions and the presiding judge decided to limit the case to the issue of the Commerce clause raised by the original plaintiffs, this order provides an indication of the plaintiff’s standing to bring forward her challenge of the H.R. 3590, noting
"Taitz contends, and I agree, that she has satisfied steps (1) and (2). Her motion to intervene was timely and, as a Doctor of Dental Surgery, who will be affected by this act, she clearly has an interest in this action".
Regardless of whether ultimately the plaintiff in this action will prevail or not, above ruling of the sister court has indicated that Taitz has standing to bring her action challenging H.R. 3590, which to a great extend serves as an opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss due to lack of standing.
Additionally, Judge Vinson does not find the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility due to lack of Natural Born status to be frivolous. He simply states that in the interest of expediency he decided to limit the case to the issues raised by the original plaintiffs. Yet again is seems to negate the notion by the defense that the eligibility issue is frivolous. Clearly, the plaintiff, as A Doctor of Dental Surgery, having tangible interest and standing to bring forward the issue of legitimacy of H.R. 3590 "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" can do so on both the basis of violation of the Commerce clause, as well as on basis of Common law Fraud and Quo Warranto, asserting that the bill was signed by one who got into the position of Presidency by virtue of fraud and concealment of all of the original vital records, as the affidavits of three licensed investigators show that the defendant fraudulently used multiple US Social Security numbers, and the Social Security number 042-68-4425 used by the defendant for most of his life, was issued to another individual in the
state of Connecticut. US Attorneys Machen, Contreras and Burch, who have been representing the defendant in this case, have a conflicting duty to "We The People of the United States", including the plaintiff in this case, to protect and defend them against such fraud. Above US attorneys have been put on notice of the fraud committed via the pleadings in this case, yet they breached their duty and their Oath of Office to defend the Constitution and to defend "We, the People of the United States". As such, they became accomplices to the above fraud and other possible criminal acts, to be fully investigated during discovery. Judge Vinson in his order states "The parties to this litigation, and, indeed, the citizens of this country, have an interest in having this case resolved as soon as possible". The plaintiff is praying for expedient discovery, as she, as well as other doctors and other citizens need an adjudication on the issue of fraud committed by Mr. Obama in order to get into office.
Wherefore,
Plaintiff respectfully requests Judicial notice of the above order as an indication of the Plaintiffs standing. She also requests expedient adjudication of prior Motion for Injunctive relief, as well as the plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, which the clerk of the court has erroneously docketed together with the First Amended Complaint (pages 129-145) when the plaintiff’s Electronic Filing Code didn’t function yet.
/s/ DR ORLY TAITZ ESQ
By:__________________________________
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (California Bar 223433)
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel.: 949-683-5411; Fax: 949-766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
PROOF OF SERVICE
I CERTIFY THAT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ABOVE PLEADINGS WAS SERVED by electronic filing on 04.09.10 on
Alan Burch, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia
555 4th str.,N.W.
Washington D.C. 20530
/s/Orly Taitz
Dr. Orly Taitz Esq
29839 Santa Margarita PKWY
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Proposed Order
Judicial notice granted.
It is so ordered and adjudged
Honorable Royce C. Lamberth